Vol. 41, No. 3

A Note from the Chairman Emeritus

Two hundred and twenty years ago this summer, fifty five delegates from America’s thirteen states locked themselves in a room in Philadelphia to hammer out a new Constitution for our Nation.

The Search for Common Ground – A Q&A with Howard Baker

The former Tennessee Senator discusses a bipartisan effort he is leading to break the political logjam and forge a consensus on some of the key challenges facing our Nation.

The Truth about Congressional Gridlock

He spent 40 years in Congress. Now, the former House Republican Leader writes the institution is suffering from neglect and proposes some reforms that, he says, are long overdue.

The Making of the President’s Health Plan 2008

Recent calls for universal health coverage remind some of similar proposals made during the 1992 presidential campaign. But differences exist in today’s debate, and the chances for sweeping reform are slim.

Bloomberg Tackles Poverty

The Mayor of New York establishes a public-private partnership to help his city’s less fortunate. His plan is bipartisan and innovative. But will it work?

Finding Consensus on an International Counter-Narcotics Strategy

According to the Ranking Republican of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, politics is standing in the way of a plan to stem the flow of drugs into America.

The AMT: Not Such a Minimal Tax

The Alternative Minimum Tax is affecting more and more moderate income taxpayers. The solution does not lie in raising taxes on others, but rather in broader reform of the tax code itself.

The Road to Fundamental Immigration Reform

Congress is on the verge of reforming an immigration system that is 40 years old. An assessment of the legislation, from the politics of the measure to what it will achieve.

Hoping for a Medicare Miracle

This year’s Medicare Trustees’ Report once again found the system in trouble. Because of a new law, however, the President now has to do something about it.

Making Government Work

In an excerpt from a speech delivered this past April, America’s Comptroller General discusses the need to transform the federal bureaucracy so it better meets the demands of 21st century life.

Form Follows Function

Senator Joe Lieberman’s decision to change the seating chart on his Committee drew chuckles. But it also served a purpose.

Ripon Profile of M. Jodi Rell

The party must move to the center – cease polarizing every issue – and listen more closely to everyday people.

The Search for Common Ground – A Q&A with Howard Baker

cover pic

Howard H. Baker, Jr. served three terms as a United States Senator from Tennessee (1967-1985) and was Tennessee’s first popularly elected Republican Senator.

Senator Baker gained national recognition in 1973 as Vice Chairman of the Senate Watergate Committee. Three years later, he was keynote speaker at the Republican National Convention and was a 1980 candidate for the Republican presidential nomination.

He concluded his Senate career in 1985 after two terms as Majority Leader (1981 to 1985) and two terms as Minority Leader (1977 to 1981). He was President Reagan’s Chief of Staff from February 1987 to July 1988. From 2001 – 2005, he served as America’s 26th Ambassador to Japan.

Over the course of his long and distinguished career, Senator Baker’s reputation for straight-talk, candor and honesty not only earned him the respect of his colleagues in Washington, but the admiration of the American people and countless others around the world. Moreover, his ability to bring people of different viewpoints together also won him a nickname – “The Great Conciliator.”

It was in the spirit of conciliation that Senator Baker, along with former Republican Senator Bob Dole and former Democratic Senators George Mitchell and Tom Daschle, announced earlier this year the establishment of The Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC), a new organization whose sole purpose is to find common ground between the parties on some of the most pressing challenges facing our country.

The Forum recently asked Senator Baker about the BPC, why it was established, and what he hopes it will accomplish.

RF: What is the purpose of the Bipartisan Policy Center?

HB: Too often, partisanship poisons our national dialogue. Unfortunately, respectful discourse across party lines has become the exception – not the norm. To confront this challenge, the Bipartisan Policy Center was formed to develop and promote solutions that would attract the public support and political momentum to achieve real progress. The BPC acts as an incubator for policy efforts that engage top political figures, advocates, academics and business leaders in the art of principled compromise. In addition to advancing specific proposals, the BPC also is broadcasting a different type of policy discourse that seeks to unite the constructive center in the pursuit of common goals. 

RF: How do you hope to impact the public policy debate in Washington?

HB: I’m a life-long and proud Republican. Unlike some, however, I don’t believe loyalty to party precludes common sense decision and policymaking.  Some of our Nation’s greatest triumphs have come when political leaders have not allowed partisan differences to deter their efforts to find solutions that are in the Nation’s best interest. Throughout my time as Senate Majority Leader, I took pride in seeking and heeding the advice of my colleagues from the other side of the aisle. Unfortunately, it would seem that now-a-days in many instances, times have changed and partisan rhetoric in Washington now often impedes our public policy making process. 

RF: Aren’t partisan differences – and the debate and discussion over these differences – an essential part of our democracy?

HB: Loyalty to one’s party is critical. Adlai Stevenson once called partisanship “the lifeblood of democracy.”  Differences between individuals should be civilly debated, but it is critical one never loses respect for a colleague’s opinion. It is important to note that the Bipartisan Policy Center does not espouse what some have called a “trans-partisan” or “postpartisan” model. We believe that principled debate and compromise does not require one to abandon his or her party. Moreover, we seek to encourage a return of comity to congressional debate that we believe has eroded in the last decade. 

RF: With the 2008 election season already upon us, are you concerned that any effort to promote bipartisanship is going to take a back seat to the rough and tumble of the presidential campaign?

HB: There will always be partisan debate; that is the nature of the presidential selection process. I think both Democrats and Republicans agree, however, that the majority of the American people are looking for pragmatic and principled leadership in their candidates. They want congress and the president to work with each other; not against each other.  

Senator Baker, along with the other founders of the Bipartisan Policy Center: George Mitchell, Tom Daschle, and Bobe Dole.
Senator Baker, along with the other founders of the Bipartisan Policy Center: George Mitchell, Tom Daschle, and Bobe Dole.

RF: Have you been in touch with any of the presidential candidates or the leadership in Congress to discuss what you are trying to do? If so, what has been the reaction?

HB: The BPC has several ongoing specific policy projects; one focusing on energy policy, one on agriculture policy, one on ways to reform national security and one on transportation. We select issues that we believe are ripe for partisan agreement. To this extent, the BPC conducts research and evidence-based surveys to compose thoughtful and pragmatic solutions that are then passed on to current members of Congress for their consideration.  Furthermore, the BPC has recently formed a working relationship with the Senate Common Ground Coalition – a group of approximately twenty sitting U.S. Senators who largely share the same goals and vision as the BPC. We are excited about this new endeavor.  

Senator Baker at the 1973 Watergate hearings.
Senator Baker at the 1973 Watergate hearings.
I don’t believe loyalty to party precludes common sense decision and policy making.

RF: Why is it in the best interests of Republicans to work cooperatively with Democrats at a time when many believe that the best way for the GOP to reclaim their congressional majority is by sharpening political differences between the two parties and denying the Democrats any chance of legislative success?

HB: Our most valued public servants – whether Democratic or Republican – should be inspired by just such a sense of duty, a sense of service and a deep desire to do what is right for our Nation, whether it is politically advantageous or not. I believe the BPC will serve as an important mechanism in promoting common sense public discourse. I look forward to working with my colleagues on issues that are vital to this great country.   RF