Ripon Forum


Vol. 44, No. 3

View Print Edition

Editor’s Note: In This Edition

For years, fiscal gurus and budgetary experts have been warning us about the long term implications of spending more than we take in. The economy will collapse, they warned. Social Security and other important programs will become unaffordable. The standard of living that millions of people had grown accustomed to will no longer exist. For […]

After the Revolution

U.S. Senator John Thune (R-SD) speaks on America’s dissatisfaction with Obama’s promised revolution of hope and change and what must now be done. “They have learned that change isn’t always for the better. Sometimes it is a return to the failed policies and discredited ideas of the past.”

A Recipe for Economic Disaster

“In order to help keep small businesses on the forefront of the markets, it is critical that leaders in Washington foster an environment that encourages creativity and promotes free enterprise.”

In Memoriam- Art Lifson

Medicare’s Crisis of Accountablility

Accountability seems to be a watchword in Washington these days. It is preached by the President, spoken by the Speaker, and has become a standard component of Democratic rhetoric this year.

Advice for My Party As I Head for the Door

BOB BENNETT“As I look out at the political landscape now, I find plenty of slogans on the Republican side, but not very many ideas.” The concern I have is that ideology and a demand for absolute party purity endangers our ability to govern once we get into office. A personal story – back in 1976, […]

Why Missile Defense Is Still Needed

Some arguments are worth repeating. “Take missile defense. The basic justification for developing this weapon system has not changed much since President Reagan proposed it in 1983. But the threats have changed.”

The Perfect Storm, Part I:

“Congress and the Administration must rein in spending and stabilize federal debt relative to GDP.”

The Perfect Storm, Part II: What the Crisis will Look Like When it Hits

Maya MacGuineas makes predictions about the path our nation is headed and presents an argument on what should be done: “To get out of this mess, and we would ultimately have to do what politicians were trying to avoid—raise taxes and cut spending – but to a much greater degree than we ever would have […]

The Perfect Storm, Part III: While Congress Slept

U.S. Senator Mike Enzi discusses how the failure of Congress to pass the budget is to neglect their duty and responsibility. “The majority leadership of this Congress is not doing something, and it’s running our country’s financial future into the ground.”

The Most Important Governor to Watch

“Voters aren’t stupid. But they often don’t pay attention to the details of public policy, especially at the state level. That’s why, when a forceful political leader comes along and points out the obvious, big things can happen fast.”

Moderates and the Wimp Factor

Lou Zickar, the Ripon Forum’s Editor, challenges moderate Republicans to be tough rather than live up to their reputation of being soft. “To counter this perception, moderate Republicans need to find the fiscal equivalent of a pork rind – something that will let them demonstrate their fiscal resolve and commitment to reducing the national debt.”

The Ripon Profile of Charlie Dent

“As Republicans, we must present a concise and understandable agenda that speaks to the economic and fiscal issues that are currently the greatest concern to the American public. “

The Most Important Governor to Watch

Voters aren’t stupid. But they often don’t pay attention to the details of public policy, especially at the state level. That’s why, when a forceful political leader comes along and points out the obvious, big things can happen fast.

We’ve seldom seen a better example of such rapid change than the dramatic steps Republican Governor Chris Christie has forced through in New Jersey. Just six months in office, Christie has established himself as the most important governor to watch as states wrestle with budget woes that will require years of yet-unidentified changes in fiscal policy to resolve. He’s done it the old-fashioned way: Using the public power of the chief executive’s office to educate citizens about the causes of the problem, promoting what most voters consider common-sense solutions, and insisting that the Legislature agree to reforms that entrenched opposition previously made impossible.

Christie won voter support for what turned out to be a comfortable victory over Democratic incumbent Jon Corzine by campaigning primarily on spending and tax issues, with a special emphasis on New Jersey’s notoriously high property taxes. Of the 10 counties nationwide where property taxes are highest as a proportion of homeowner income, six are in the Garden State, according to the nonpartisan Tax Foundation (the other four are in New York). In a review of his successful electoral strategy, The New York Times cited the state’s “suffocating tax burden” as a primary challenge facing the incoming governor.

What makes Christie unique? The ambitious scale of his program to limit spending. An aggressive style that includes taking on the most powerful interests in the state – the public employee unions, especially the teachers. And finally, a record of one unexpected victory after another.

But what makes this new chief executive especially important isn’t that he faces unique budget problems. Precisely the opposite: Virtually every state confronts the challenges Governor Christie is attacking so aggressively.

What makes Christie unique? The ambitious scale of his program to limit spending. An aggressive style that includes taking on the most powerful interests in the state – the public employee unions, especially the teachers. And finally, a record of one unexpected victory after another.

Pushing the Envelope
From a short-term perspective, the states’ budget gaps are driven by historic drops in revenue, caused in turn by the recent deep recession and slow recovery. Starting with the final three months of 2008, overall tax revenues to the states fell on a year-over-year basis for five straight quarters – a decline not seen since at least the Great Depression. The Rockefeller Institute of Government reported in July that the start of 2010 finally brought an increase in revenues. That was largely the result of legislated tax increases in New York and California, though. Overall collections were still down by more than 9 percent from two years earlier.

Research from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and elsewhere makes clear that the tough fiscal times for state and local governments will not end soon. Full recovery from recent revenue losses may take several years. By 2015, according to GAO’s projections, the state-local sector will be well into a long-term deterioration of overall fiscal balance caused largely by rising costs for health care, including benefits for public employees and retirees. Over the next two to three decades, state and local officials would need to raise taxes, restrain spending, and/or find cost efficiencies valued at $350 billion or so in today’s dollars to eliminate the gaps projected by GAO. For context, that’s equivalent to more than half of all spending on K-12 education, or all state-local sales taxes and corporate income taxes combined.

To be sure, the immediate crisis confronting Christie when he took office this January was among the worst in the country. State officials estimated the gap between projected revenues and expenditures at more than $10 billion, on a prior-year basis of $29 billion. As is the case in many states, recent years’ fiscal plans had been balanced with gimmicks or one-time revenues (such as $700 million from a tax amnesty plan), and use of extraordinary federal aid with no plan for when the Washington stimulus ends.

The Christie approach to closing the gap began immediately with executive action to reduce spending for the fiscal year ending June 30. The governor’s office in New Jersey is institutionally among the strongest in the nation, with budgetary and appointment powers many other top elected officials lack. Even with that authority, Christie pushed the envelope of his executive powers to eliminate – without legislative approval – billions in expenditures that his predecessor and the Legislature had approved seven months earlier.

…Christie pushed the envelope of his executive powers to eliminate – without legislative approval – billions in expenditures that his predecessor and the Legislature had approved seven months earlier.

His March budget proposal for the current year went further. It called for reducing overall spending by more than 8 percent, including cuts to politically sensitive areas such as education and health care. Having promised to retain popular property-tax relief checks for homeowners, Christie said the state would simply “take a break” for a year and restore the payments in 2011. He even spread the political blame for some budget-busting actions of the past, citing “the unwarranted 9 percent pension increase granted by Republicans in 2001 but never paid for by either party.”

Making a particularly risky investment of political capital, Christie told voters in April they should take a stand against school spending by voting against local education budgets. The result: voter turnout in school elections rose sharply, and 58 percent of budgets were defeated – the largest rejection rate in 35 years.

The focus on education spending and budget cuts didn’t endear the Governor to public-employee unions. A highly publicized internal memo from a teacher union official seemed to ask for divine intervention to bring Christie to his eternal reward quickly (the union leader said the prayer was a bad joke).

But it backfired, building the Governor’s political standing – and thus his ability to sway the Legislature – even further.

Making the Sale
Christie was pushing for legislative action on a constitutional amendment imposing a 2.5 percent annual limit on local property tax increases. The Legislature instead approved a 2.9 percent statutory limit – thus leaving room for future legislated changes to the limit – along with a number of exceptions to the cap.

“We’re willing to compromise, but the Governor hasn’t shown that willingness,” the Democratic Senate president, Stephen M. Sweeney, said in late June.

Christie went into campaign mode again, touring the state and visiting homeowners to build public pressure. Barely two weeks later, both houses of the Legislature had approved a compromise measure that was statutory only (as the Legislature sought), but capped increases at 2 percent (cutting the existing cap in half, below even the Governor’s proposal) and allowing local voters to override the statewide limit if they choose.

As he told the crowd in an Ocean County community center, “You ain’t seen nothing yet.”

The ultimate effect of that compromise remains to be determined. And, clearly, Governor Christie has not been able to resolve the budget problems entirely. Perhaps most troubling, this year’s budget makes no provision for funding employee pensions – an omission that critics say means shifting $3 billion in expenses to the future, with no identifiable plan to cover the cost. And projections show a $10 billion budget gap approaching in 2011.

But this Governor has only just begun. Marking his six month anniversary in office in mid-July, Christie renewed the call for major pension reforms and steps to help local governments cope with reduced revenues.

As he told the crowd in an Ocean County community center, “You ain’t seen nothing yet.” For this new master of the bully pulpit, that sounds about right. RF

Robert B. Ward is deputy director of the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, at the State University of New York’s University of Albany.